Make Pricing & Plans [2026]

Make uses a credit-based pricing model where each operation consumes credits based on complexity. Standard modules use 1 credit per operation, while AI modules and complex operations may consume multiple credits. This system provides more predictable costs for multi-step workflows compared to per-task pricing.

Free Plan

The free tier includes 1,000 credits monthly with 2 active scenarios and 15-minute minimum intervals. This is genuinely useful for testing automations and light personal use, though the scenario limit restricts complex setups. You get access to all integrations and core features without requiring a credit card.

Core Plan - $10.59/month

The Core plan provides 10,000 credits with unlimited active scenarios and 1-minute intervals. This tier works well for freelancers and small businesses running moderate automation workloads. You also get access to Make's API and improved data transfer limits, making it suitable for most professional use cases.

Pro Plan - $18.82/month

Pro adds priority execution, custom variables, and full-text execution search for the same 10,000 credits. The priority execution is valuable during peak usage times when free and Core plan scenarios may experience delays. This plan suits professionals who need reliable performance and advanced debugging capabilities.

Teams Plan - $34.12/month

Teams introduces collaboration features including user roles, scenario sharing, and template creation. With 10,000 credits shared across team members, this plan works for small agencies or departments that need to collaborate on automation projects while maintaining security and organization.

The main consideration is credit consumption rates. High-frequency scenarios checking every minute can burn through credits quickly just on trigger checks, potentially making unlimited-task competitors more economical for simple, frequent automations. However, for complex workflows with multiple steps, Make's credit system often provides better value than per-task pricing models.

Make stands out as the sweet spot between simple automation tools and complex enterprise platforms. Its visual scenario builder makes sophisticated workflow automation accessible without requiring coding skills, while the credit-based pricing often provides better value than task-based competitors for complex, multi-step processes.

The platform's greatest strengths are its flexibility, detailed execution logging, and ability to handle complex data transformations and conditional logic. The learning curve is real but manageable, and the comprehensive documentation and community support help new users get up to speed relatively quickly.

However, Make isn't perfect. The credit consumption model requires careful monitoring, especially for high-frequency scenarios, and some advanced features may feel overwhelming for users who just need basic automations. The user interface, while powerful, can feel cluttered compared to more streamlined alternatives.

Choose Make if you need complex, branching automations and have team members willing to invest time in learning the platform. It's particularly valuable for operations teams, technical marketers, and growing businesses that have outgrown simple automation tools but aren't ready for enterprise-grade solutions. For basic trigger-action workflows, consider Zapier. For unlimited high-volume processing, evaluate n8n or custom solutions.